Archive for MASTER PLAN

WAS PRIVATE MEETING WITH A HANDFUL OF VERDE VALLEY POLITICIANS INTENDED AS A POLITICAL CAMPAIGN OF SORTS TO PERSUADE THEM THAT THE PRESCOTT-BASED ADMINISTRATORS ARE TREATING SEDONA/VERDE VALLEY “EQUITABLY”?

Assuming reported claims about the meeting are correct, at least $28.8 million of Sedona/Verde Valley taxes have been shipped over Mingus Mountain to Prescott for use in their development projects during the last dozen years, which is considered by Prescott administrators as “equitable”

According to various sources, Yavapai Community College claimed at the private meeting held with local politicos March 22 that on average it annually on average receives around $15.3 million in cash from Sedona/Verde Valley. Of that amount, and according to the sources, on average over a 12 year period the College claims  it spends about  $12.9 million annually in Sedona/Verde Valley.

Assuming that these College figures are relatively accurate, they show that at least $2.4 million of Sedona/Verde funds are  being shipped to the Prescott side of Mingus Mountain each year where they are invested in projects primarily for use over there.

Moreover, if this data is correct, over the past 12 years Sedona and the Verde Valley taxpayers have contributed $28.8 million in cash to the Prescott Community College executives that has been used for  investments on that side of the Mingus.

The Community College administrators apparently believe that this is “equitable.”

The Blog notes that various documents supporting the  alleged equity claim were floated by the College among the local politicians at the private Sedona meeting. Curiously, the College had an opportunity to openly introduce these documents to the general public during the regular Board meeting  on Tuesday preceding the private meeting because the preliminary capital budget was an agenda item along with  consulting reports on the 8-10 year future development plan.  However, the College did not choose to do so. Why not?

The Blog also notes that meetings such as the private one held March 22 with local officials raise serious accountability issues associated with public officials whose salaries are paid by taxpayers. One cannot help but be somewhat curious where taxpayer paid officials hold  meetings  outside a legally announced executive session where the public is barred, no minutes are taken, and no audio or video record is provided. Moreover, such meetings make a mockery of claims by public officials that  they are open and transparent about how public funds are being used.

PRESENT FEAR OF SHUTTERING SEDONA CENTER IS GENERATED BY DECISION GOVERNING BOARD MADE IN 2014 TO SELL IT | THIS EXPLAINS THE IMMEDIATE STRONG REACTION BY EAST COUNTY REPRESENTATIVE WHEN “SHUTTERING” CAME UP AT MARCH 22 MEETING

Development plan adopted 4-1 by Governing Board in December 2013 with phases one and two shown below unequivocally anticipates the sale of the Sedona Center and leasing property in Sedona

When the Governing Board began a brief discussion at the March 22, 2022 Governing Board meeting about efficiency, too much space, closing campuses, centers, etc.,  it is no wonder that the Sedona/Verde Valley representative Paul Chevalier was immediately moved to react strongly. 

After all, it was only eight years ago that the same Governing Board (with only one member from the 2014 Board still on it) that voted to sell the Sedona Center.

For proof, one need only look at the charts prepared for the Governing Board back in 2013-14  showing the sale. They are reproduced below.

You might note  the enormous amount of money the Governing Board was prepared to use on the Prescott area improvements when compared to Sedona/Verde Valley.  The charts are the clearest evidence of the mindset of the Governing Board at the time of where and how money was to be allocated.  The east side of the County was not seriously considered.

EXAMINATION OF HALF CENTURY DEVELOPMENT OF PROGRAMS, PROJECTS, ETC. IN PRESCOTT AREA HELPS EXPLAIN WHY PRESCOTT DOMINATES ALL THINGS COMMUNITY COLLEGE IN SEDONA/VERDE VALLEY TODAY

Detailed charts illustrate why the dominance will continue into the future

There appears to be little doubt but that the Prescott based executives and the west-side voting block on the Yavapai Community College Governing Board will continue to control all things educational for Sedona and the Verde Valley into the future.  The residents on the east side of Mingus Mountain are virtually helpless to do anything about it.

The charts below illustrate the west side’s  total dominance over the past half century and explain why it will continue in that role absent a major legislative change.  The hope that the current administration would be amenable to considering creating two Administrative College Districts, one on the west side and the other on the east side, apparently sent shivers about cash flow down the backs of Prescott executives.

A  primary reason there will be no major development changes is that the Prescott executives, after five decades, have completed most of their dreamed for  facilities and programs on the west  side. Now that they have most of them (they have just recently set aside a couple million to expand in Prescott Valley), it’s going to cost a lot of money to maintain and keep them going. They just dished out over a million, for example, to fix the roof, air conditioning, etc. on the Performing Arts Center.  

The upkeep alone on the west-side “empire” will require continued significant financial help over the years from east side residents. The money flowing to the west side comes  via east-side  property taxes, construction taxes, student tuition, plus state and federal grants based in part on east side student enrollment. Having spent so much money on developing the west side of the County, it is reaching a point so it “just can’t afford much investment in Sedona/Verde Valley.”  Just enough, probably, to keep the 70,000 residents from seriously uprising against the incredibly unfair treatment suffered by them over the past 50 years.

Review the charts for greater details and explanation.

DATA FROM CONSULTANTS SUGGEST PROSPECTS ARE DIM FOR MAJOR COMMUNITY COLLEGE DEVELOPMENT IN SEDONA/VERDE VALLEY OVER THE NEXT DECADE

College certain to use terms such as “little need,” “no interest,” and “growing west side population” as excuses for not investing in east side of County via the Campus Master Plan | Camp Verde not mentioned so far

If the current development charts produced by Yavapai Community College consultants are any indication, the prospects for major investment on the east side of the County over the next decade by the College appear pretty dim. That is not good news for the almost 70,000 residents living on the east side of Mingus Mountain. 

The charts strongly suggest that programs such as nursing and allied health will be expanded and enhanced on the west side of the County. There is no indication that similar enhancement will occur on the east side, despite the fact the College publicly claims that it has 600 applicants on a waiting list for its nursing program.

The Career and Technical Education campus at the Prescott airport appears to be in line for new electric car programs and development.  The 3D construction program on the west side will be expanded while nothing appears planned for the east side.

A new media studio is planned for the west side, which will complete the Prescott total take-over and transfer of the once thriving film school located at the College’s Sedona Center.  

Improving the athletic fields and indoor space for the burgeoning athletic programs appear to have been given  priority on the west side of the County.  In addition, student dining areas will be enhanced on the west side only. (There is a recommendation that the cafeteria at the  Verde Campus be reopened.)

Possible truck driving training and collaboration on use of the Sedona Performing Arts Center are the only two projects that clearly appear on the horizon for the east side of the County.  They will cost little.

Camp Verde is so far not mentioned in the documents the Blog has been able to obtain.

It would seem that the input at public meetings on the  Verde Campus had little impact on the consultants.  At those meetings there was strong support from east side residents for expanding the nursing program, creating housing for students and possibly faculty, and enhancing the small Career and Technical Education Center.  None of those east side views are reflected in the  data so far.

One can hope that the Blog is wrong.  But take a look at the charts prepared by the consultants and posted on the College Master Plan website – click here to go to the Master Plan website.  

SMALL TURN-OUT FOR SECOND EIGHT-YEAR COMMUNITY COLLEGE MASTER PLAN PUBLIC FORUM FEBRUARY 14 ON VERDE CAMPUS

Forum attracted less than two dozen including faculty, staff students and former attendees who heard Smithgroup consultants indicate most major development will likely end up on the west side of the County

Yavapai Community College held its second Master Plan public forum on the east side of the County November 14 on the Verde Campus in a one-hour afternoon session. The purpose was to  share  information about the progress of the Smithgroup’s efforts to generate an eight-year development plan for the entire District. And to gather additional public input about the plan.

Attendance was small with a majority of those present having attended the first forum or were College administrators, staff, and faculty. The tiny turn-out may reflect what some fear as a continuing deep-seated apathy about community colleges and  post-secondary education at these institutions.

The Smithgroup consultants provided the attendees with a PowerPoint presentation regarding current room usage, location and number of internet student users, and projects under consideration as part of the eight-year plan. As anticipated, the west side of the County led the east by a wide margin in terms of potential project enhancements.

The Smithgroup experts were asked a wide variety of questions that sometimes appeared challenging for them. For example, when asked whether the 13,000 residents of the Verde Villages were included in their east-side analysis, they appeared not to recognize the purpose of the question. Without  directly responding, they said  they used recent census data, which left the question hanging. The concern, of course, is that the Verde Villages have historically been ignored or omitted in discussions by the Community College when determining east County development —the College appearing to  not understand the population of Cottonwood is around 11,000 and the adjacent unincorporated Verde Villages has a population of around 13,000.

To a question about its survey process, the Smithgroup admitted it had not surveyed the general population of the Verde Valley regarding their post-secondary needs. Rather,  it said its focus was on current users and current uses.

It appears, at least at this time, that housing, a major issue for the Verde Campus and the Sedona Center, may not be addressed in the eight-year plan. Moreover, the Smithgroup did not seem to grasp the importance of a question put to them from the public about the relationship between  destination programs in Sedona and the Verde Campus, overall east campus enrollment, and housing needs.

When the question of enhancing the nursing program on the Verde Campus came up the College Administration said there are about six hundred applicants on a waiting list seeking  training. However, the Administration explained that there is a problem finding sufficient clinical experiences for the current enrollment. There was, however, an indication that the College may look to the Prescott Campus for more nursing training. Nothing suggested the nursing program on the Verde Campus would be enhanced despite the long waiting list.

The best news coming out of the meeting was a tentative indication that the College may attempt to enhance the Performing Arts Program on the east side of the County. How much enhancement and where and how was yet to be determined.

(More when slides as posted as promised so you can analyze the presentation for yourself.)

YAVAPAI COMMUNITY COLLEGE TO HOLD SECOND ROUND OF MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT ONE-HOUR PUBLIC FORUMS IN PRESCOTT AND THE VERDE VALLEY ON VALENTINE’S DAY (FEB 14)

The forum in the Verde Valley is scheduled for  the Verde Campus in Building “M,” Room 137 from 4 p.m. to 5 p.m. | This is second round of forums as the first forums were held December 6 and 7

Yavapai Community College has announced that it will spend one hour on Monday,  February 14 from 4:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. at an open forum on the Verde Campus, Building “M,” Room 137. The purpose of a second forum appears to be  essentially the same as the first. According to the Community College’s announcement on is web page, the second forum on February 14 will be used:

 “to help guide the next eight years of capital investments for college facilities. The Campus Master Plan will incorporate the College’s Strategic Plan to determine where and when to invest resources at the campuses and centers to either upgrade, enhance, or construct infrastructure to support academic facilities and support resources and/or create student engagement and activity areas, community common spaces, improve campus and center aesthetics, among others.”

Recall that the first public forum on the Master Plan was  held on the Verde Campus on December 6, 2021. There was a good turn-out for that meeting with citizens  from Sedona and the Verde Valley in attendance. It included Sedona’s mayor, former mayor,  vice mayor and members of the local town and city councils. There were also a few faculty from the Verde Campus.  

In general, the citizens at the first forum  expressed a strong need for development in Sedona and the Verde Campus over the next decade that included faculty/student on-campus housing, enhanced and expanded Career and Technical Education facilities, an enhanced and expanded vineyard and viticulture program, an expanded  and improved  culinary facility at the  Sedona Center, and continued support and expansion of the Allied Health programs. They also encouraged the College to consider adding  programs that are not included on the east side of the County such as music and theatre.

There were concerns expressed from some of the citizens at the first forum in December about the composition of the present sixteen-member development planning steering committee. This committee is heavily balanced in favor of the west side of the County.  It  consists of fourteen persons from Prescott and only two from the Verde Valley.

There were also expressions of concern at the first forum among some that ten years ago the same planning team used back then was hired once again to plan future development. The last time the Community College created a development plan it ended up with a  $103.5 million dollar plan with over 95% of development focused on the west side of the County along with the possible closing of the Sedona Center. There were hopeful expressions during the first forum in December of this year that a ten-year(or eight-year) plan created in  2022  would not yield such an incredibly uneven and unfair  result.

Recall that a decade ago east side residents also spoke to the same  planning group that was once again hired to do Community College development planning.  Those east side voices made  no dent in the decision to allocate virtually all major development to the west side of the County and to shutter programs and support staff on the east side of the County.

It should be remembered that Sedona/Verde Valley residents have been politically fighting the  $103.5 development plan ever since with occasional but grudging success it was approved by the Governing Board 4-1 back in December 2013.   It was hoped that with a new administration there would  be a serious effort to begin diverting  millions of dollars to  the east side to seriously develop educational opportunities there.

It will be challenging, of course, to make up for the decades the east side has been virtually ignored in terms of serious development by the Community College.  The history of the College is that for over 50 years serious development and funding have been poured into the west side of the County  where the result is a heavily financed small college or university-like institution.

The discussion in the first forum was directed by a member of the Smith Group consulting organization. The moderator at that forum ran out of time to respond to a wide variety of citizen questions. 

DR. RHINE MUM ON FUTURE OF VERDE VALLEY DEVELOPMENT PENDING COMPLETION OF PLANS NOW BEING WORKED OUT; CHEVALIER OUTLINES UNMET NEEDS ON EAST SIDE INCLUDING CTE AND PERFORMING ARTS

President says she won’t make commitment on future development she can’t keep | Chevalier asks College to share data with the Board regarding east side development it claims to have collected

Community College President Dr. Lisa Rhine was requested by Third District Governing Board Representative Paul Chevalier during the January 28 District Governing Board Workshop in Prescott Valley to share her views about the future development of the Community College in the Verde Valley.  In response, she refused to give any information saying that at this time she was “unwilling to commit to a plan” that she was unable to “fulfill.”  

Community College President Dr. Lisa Rhine

Third District Governing Board Representative Paul Chevalier

Dr. Rhine also said in response to the request that the Community College was “working diligently on a plan” for the entire County and collecting data to ensure that the plan is “based on needs” supported “by evidence –data.”  She said the while there are “exciting plans for the whole county” it was “premature to share those plans” until there was certainty and the Board had approved them and a budget to support them.

Third District Representative Paul Chevalier asked about a Sedona meeting regarding development of the Performing Arts on the east side of the County. Dr. Rhine said she did not have any information about the meeting because it was in one of her Vice President’s areas.

Dr. Rhine was also asked by Chevalier if she would supply the data about the east side of the County the Community College had collected to use for future development decisions. She gave no direct response to that question. (Please see Video clip below.)

Representative Chevalier outlined his view of a few of the current unmet needs on the east side of the County that he believed were identical to those of citizens on the west side.  Those needs included more Career and Technical Education training and facilities and a need for many more Performing Arts educational programs. 

Chevalier made a strong argument for adding Performing Arts educational programming to the Community College curriculum on the east side.  He noted there were over 500 students enrolled in Performing Arts programs on the Prescott Campus this fall while only one or two classes and possibly a dozen students made up the Performing Arts curriculum and student population taking classes on the east side. He said we “probably have as many performing artists on the east side as on the west side” of the County.  . . . In Sedona alone, we have four Grammy winners.  . . . Mingus High School has a very vibrant Performing Arts program and Red Rock High School has a program as well.” 

According to Chevalier, when students in the Verde Valley graduate, “there’s no institution on the east side that you can go to and get Performing Arts.  That is something that is just as important on the east side as on the west side.”  However, the need on the east side, said Chevalier, “is not being catered to at all” by the Community College.

For additional context and discussion and to check the accuracy of this post, please see the video clip below of the Governing Board discussion with Dr. Rhine at the January 28 Governing Board meeting.  A video record of the entire Governing Board meeting is anticipated to be posted by the Community College following the next meeting of the Governing Board once the minutes of the Workshop are approved.  Please monitor the Governing Board website for the posting if you are interested in reviewing the entire meeting.

 

STEERING COMMITTEE TO DEVELOP COMMUNITY COLLEGE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT MASTER PLAN FOR NEXT TEN YEARS ALMOST COMPLETELY DOMINATED BY PRESCOTT

Fourteen of 16 members from Prescott; Verde Valley  Dean Dr. Tina Redd not included on Committee

Yavapai Community College is in the process of developing a ten-year Capital Master Plan (CMP).  One of the first steps has been to set up a steering committee.  The CMP  sixteen person Committee is completely dominated by Prescott based executives and employees; only two of the members come from the Verde Valley. (See list below.) 

Absent from the CMP  was the Verde Valley Campus Dean, Dr. Tina Redd.  (See list below.) 

According to the College, the CMP steering committee consists of members who also serve on the Facilities and Technology Committee, which meets once a month to provide input and receive feedback on the progress of the College’s planning partner. In addition, members of the Executive Leadership Team meet monthly with the SmithGroup team to monitor progress, serve as a checkpoint and provide feedback as to the direction the CMP is taking.

During November, the SmithGroup team has been analyzing information provided by various departments throughout the College. Information includes past, present and future enrollment and trends, class schedules and student/community member space utilization, information related to the College’s two libraries, strategic, academic, and staffing plans, economic and demographic trends and other data.

The SmithGroup’s first tour of the campuses and centers is scheduled for December 6, 7, and 8 which will include meetings with stakeholders and conducting public forums at the Prescott and Verde Valley campuses. Prior to the arrival on campus, a survey will be sent out for you to provide input into the development of the campus master plan. Stay tuned for future announcements regarding the campus master plan which, is anticipated to take seven months.

Steering Committee Members (as listed by the Community College):

  1. Tom Aldridge Assistant Director, IT/TSS, Prescott
  2. Patrick Burns, Chief Officer, IT, Prescott
  3. James Crockett, Assistant Director, Facilities, Prescott
  4. Clint Ewell, Vice President, Finance and Administration, Prescott
  5. Marie Hardman , Early College Prog (Dual Enrollment) Advisor II, Prescott
  6. Rodney Jenkins, VP – Community Relations, Prescott
  7. Karen Jones , Director, REDC, Prescott
  8. David Laurence, Director, Facilities Planning, Prescott
  9. Sonya Liadis, HR Business Partner, Prescott
  10. Holly Molina, Specialist, Learning Center, Prescott
  11. John Morgan, Dean, CTEC/Agribusiness, Prescott
  12. Brian Moultrup, Student Leadership Team, Prescott
  13. Heather Mulcaire, Asso. Dean, VV Campus, Verde Valley
  14. Diane Ryan, Vice President, Acad. Affairs, Prescott
  15. Tania Sheldahl, Assoc. VP, Stud Dev, Prescott
  16. Linda Shook, Assoc. Dean, Sedona/OLLI, Sedona

YAVAPAI COMMUNITY COLLEGE MASTER PLAN OPEN FORUM SET FOR VERDE CAMPUS DEC 6 FROM 4:00 P.M. TO 5:00 P.M.

Interested residents can gather in room M-137 on the Clarkdale Campus to address planning team; no open forum scheduled for Sedona Center

Yavapai Community College has announced that the Strategic Master Plan  team it has hired will spend one hour on Monday,  December 6 from 4:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. to hear the “thoughts” and “concerns” of local residents about the future of the community college on this side of the Mountain. The meeting will be held on the Verde Campus in room M-137.  The Verde Campus is located at 601 W Black Hills Drive, Clarkdale, Arizona 8632. It has also planned other avenues of possible input (see announcement below).  

Recall that about ten years ago the College executives based in Prescott hired a planning team to create a Community College Master Plan. That resulted in a  $103.5 development plan coming from the planners being adopted by the College Governing Board with more than 95% of development aimed at the Prescott (west side) of the County along with the possible closing of the Sedona Center. Verde Valley residents also spoke to that planning group years ago but apparently made no dent in their decision to allocate virtually all major development to the West side of the County and to shutter programs and support staff on the east side of the County.

Sedona/Verde Valley residents have been politically fighting that $103.5 development plan ever since with occasional but grudging success.  It is hoped that with a new administration there will be a serious effort to begin diverting  millions on the east side to seriously develop educational opportunities.  The history of the College is that for 50 years development and funding has been poured into the west side where the result is a heavily financed small college or university-like institution.

COLLEGE UPDATES COMMUNITY ON PROGRESS OF TEN-YEAR MASTER PLAN ADOPTED IN DECEMBER 2013

Pre-covid College was $10 million short to meet planned capital needs not counting emerging needs

Yavapai Community College provided its perspective on how the ten-year development plan, approved 4-1 in December 2012, has progressed in a memo presented to the Governing Board at the March meeting.  Note that it says the College was PRE-COVID about $10 million short of the capital funds to meet existing projects, not counting emerging needs.  The memo is reproduced below in full.