Archive for GOVERNING BOARD – Page 7

GOVERNING BOARD MEMBER CHEVALIER SPANKS WEST-COUNTY MEMBERS’ REFUSAL TO SHARE GOVERNANCE WITH EAST-COUNTY

Says East-County has been deprived of any board leadership position for at least 12 years; laments treatment of McCasland

Third District Yavapai Community College Governing Board representative Paul Chevalier expressed his concern about the failure of the West-County Board members to seek a consensus with East-County members on important issues at the February Board meeting. Or, sharing leadership positions of any kind with members representing the east side of the County for at least the last twelve years.

After evaluating his first session with the full Board, he made the following written comments that are  included as a part of the February Board agenda.

“I have observed the Board since 2014. I have not seen the Board being engaged in any strategic thinking OR in-depth future planning at Board meetings.

“With regard to collective decision making, the west side Board leadership makes little or no effort to get consensus with the east side representatives (at least since 2014 to present).

“Board Leadership: There has not been a Chair or Secretary of the YCGB coming from the east side in 12 years. The Board majority (the three west side representatives) does not share Board leadership with the east side representatives, unlike our County Board of Supervisors that rotate the chair and secretary positions every year. The east side representatives have been shut out for twelve years!

“Last month I nominated Deb McCasland (who represents part of Verde Valley and is in her 5th year on the Board)) for secretary and all three westside representatives declined to vote for her. We continue with a chair and a secretary from the west side. The west side representatives unwillingness to share Board leadership with east side representatives contributes to making us a divided Board.

“I hope for change.”

Kudos to Mr. Chevalier!

SOME SURPRISED WHEN PRESIDENT WILLS DID NOT REPORT TO BOARD ON DEATHS OF TWO STUDENTS AND COLLAPSE OF RESA PROJECT AT CTEC

Both major events occurred within two weeks of Board meeting; yet no comment by President; is silence intended to keep the public in the dark about them?

It was a surprise to some in attendance at the November 2018 Governing Board meeting that President Penelope Wills failed to comment on the recent deaths of two Yavapai Community College students and the shuttering of the RESA project at the Career and Technical Education Center during her report to the Governing Board.  

Recall that the Prescott Valley police department identified two Yavapai Community College students who were found dead at a Prescott Valley home Saturday morning, November 3.  They are Jake Morales and Gunner Bundrick. Both had graduated from Bradshaw Mountain High School in 2017.  Bundrick was a standout quarterback at his high school.  He went on to play football at Mesa Community College before transferring to Yavapai College.  He played outfield on the Yavapai baseball team in the spring 2018.

Also recall that  the RESA Corporation and the Community College are parting ways, according to information from the College.  The training program to supply RESA, a Prescott Corporation, with college-trained technicians began with great anticipation in January 2018.  The College Board approved a three-year lease with RESA of 3,700 square feet at the Career and Technical Education Center at its March 2018 Board meeting. However, it will be shuttered when the eight remaining students complete their training this fall.

Wills’ made no mention of these incidents, the relationship to drug use on campus and the baseball team, or the reasons RESA decided to part ways with the College.   Umm.  One can only puzzle over why she didn’t comment on them.

IS COLLEGE AND MAJORITY ON GOVERNING BOARD MODELING GUTTER ETHICS FOR STUDENTS AND FACULTY AT COMMUNITY COLLEGE?

Sending taxpayer paid postcards that “might” evade state law barring use of College funds to promote political candidates is ethically irresponsible; common sense tells us the College is promoting its two favored candidates for the Governing Board by sending the postcards

The Community College is rushing to complete postcards for individual Governing Board members featuring the current board member in a district, the member’s photo plus text written by the Board member.  The publication has been described as looking like a political promotional piece for a Governing Board member.

The content of the newsletter/postcard provides an incumbent Board member with an unchallenged political platform with a photograph and an opportunity to extol his or her virtues, real or imagined.

The College is fully aware of the prohibition on using public funds to support political campaigns placed by Arizona law on Community Colleges in AZ. Stat. 15-1408 (2018). That statute bars the use of community college district resources to influence elections. Anyone with common sense knows the college is attempting to evade this statute by referring to the postcards as a Governing Board report.

Maybe the College Administration will be able to get away with its scheme.  However, in doing so, it is modeling the type of gutter politics that one would hope is frowned upon by faculty and students at the College. Frankly, in the heat of the November election and the Administration’s fear it will lose two of its closest supporters, it is ignoring any meaningful ethical behavior.

Should the Administration and the College Governing Board exhibit the highest ethical standards at all times for its students, staff and faculty?  Should it be a model of ethical behavior for the citizens of Yavapai County who support it? The answer is pretty clear: “No,” it prefers the political gutter and has no regard for ethical behavior.

 

BLOG OBTAINS MOCKUP OF POLITICAL MAILING PLANNED BY THE COLLEGE

McCasland’s mockup clearly shows how the mailing is politically tainted; McCasland says she is opposed to the mailing until a special Board meeting is convened to discuss the legal issues surrounding the material

The Blog was able to obtain a mock up of the political postcard Yavapai Community College  is intending to send to all homes and businesses in Yavapai County to support Board members Connie Harris and Ray Sigafoos.  Harris is in a tight battle to retain the seat she was appointed to a few months ago with Paul Chevalier.  Sigafoos is being challenged by Wayne Meddaugh in District #1.  Harris and Sigafoos need the taxpayer mailing to bolster their campaigns.

Take a look at the front page, which is reproduced below.  There is no question but this is a political document in the context of the November 2018 election. The College is barred by Arizona Law from using its resources to influence a political campaign.  However, can anything be any clearer about the motive of the College with these postcards than to influence the outcome of the November election?


 

GOVERNING BOARD MEMBER ASKS SIGAFOOS TO SCHEDULE SPECIAL MEETING ON LEGALITY OF TAINTED POLITICAL POSTCARD

Will Sigafoos, who politically benefits from the mailing by the College at taxpayer expense, call for a meeting before the politically tainted postcard is mailed to all County families and businesses?

The Blog has learned on good authority that a request has been made directly to Yavapai Community College Governing Board member Ray Sigafoos by a member of the Governing Board to schedule a special Board meeting to discuss the legality of the College mailing a politically tainted postcard that subtly supports Sigafoos and Connie Harris. The meeting would take place before the November election and before the College mailed the politically tainted material.

Both Sigafoos and Harris have strong opponents in the November election and need the mailing at taxpayer expense to try and bolster their campaigns.  As of the date of this Blog note (Sunday morning), there has been no response from the Chair of the Governing Board regarding the request.

As a matter of ethics, it is noted that Sigafoos is in a political battle with Wayne Meddaugh to retain his First District Governing Board seat.  For Sigafoos to make the decision to not call a special meeting immediately raises an ethical issue relating to his obvious conflict of interest in making such a decision. 


 

MCCARVER HARSHLY ATTACKS BOARD MEMBER IN BOARD EVALUATION

Doesn’t name object of her wrath but McCasland thought to be target; effort aimed at chilling exercise of free speech

Each month the Governing Board members individually evaluate the performance of the other Board members.  In the report given at the September Board meeting, (see below)  member Pat McCarver lashed out at an unnamed member charging that the member “brings up disagreement” with a previous Board decision.  She also charged that in response to whether Board members operated ethically, one of the Board members made comments and pushed agendas that “are personal, and appear to be vindictive in nature.”  McCarver provided no examples.

McCarver is obviously trying to pour cold water on the free speech of Board members. Most observers believe the comments were aimed directly at Board member Deb McCasland.  McCarver on other occasions has shown her displeasure with McCasland’s comments and disagreement over such items as increasing the tax rate.

DRAFT PROFILE FOR NEXT YAVAPAI PRESIDENT TRIES TO LOCK IN AWFUL POLICY GOVERNANCE PRACTICES AND POLICIES

Despite repeated criticism from East side representatives over the past several years, Yavapai Community College wants to continue a policy governance program that hides responsibility and accountability from public; statement in draft profile erroneously anticipates how new January Governing Board will function

The draft profile for the next Yavapai Community College president is now posted online (See it in full by clicking here.)  The most controversial language in it refers to retaining the awful Carver Policy Governance policies.  These are policies that were designed for large corporations; not for public universities and colleges.  And certainly not for Yavapai College where its direction comes from five elected officials.

The College administration loves the policy governance model because it allows the President and his or her executives to easily hide or obfuscate important information about College programs and capital development from the public and the Governing Board.  It prevents the Board from setting simple, straight-forward goals such as increasing enrollment by 5% in two years.  Or, creating a specific capital and programming vision for the Verde Campus for the next five years.

The current policy governance model has been criticized by former Governing Board members Al Filardo and Bob Oliphant.  Current second district representative Deb McCasland has repeatedly publicly  pointed out since she was elected how the policy governance model as applied at Yavapai College hides information from the Board and the public.

Despite the enormous amount of criticism, the draft says the “DBG is committed to and practices Policy Governance.”  The statement is false in the sense that the District Governing Board can drop the practice and is almost certain to do so if new members are elected to the Governing Board in November of this year. 


 

WILL RAY SIGAFOOS RUN IN NOVEMBER FOR HIS SEAT?

Tells Governing Board he has medical issues but offers no specifics

There is a question whether Ray Sigafoos, who represents District 1, will run for his seat on the College Governing Board in November.  At the May Board meeting, he indicated that he had certain medical issues at the present time.  His present term expires: December 31, 2018.

Sigafoos has lived and worked in Prescott for almost a half century, all of the time as a resident of District 1. Tim Carter and a committee appointed Sigafoos from among four applicants for the Board position that opened in October 2005 when Board Member Ed Harris died.

District 1 includes the following: Badger, Bagdad, Castle Hot Springs 1 and 2, Congress, Copper Basin, Hidden Valley, Hillside, Holiday/Well Fargo, Kirkland, Mile High, Miller Valley East and West, Montana, Mountain Club, Northside, Pine Knoll, Pine Lakes, Ponderosa, Prescott Heights, Prescott Northwest, Prescott South, Prescott Southwest, Prescott West, Rincon, Rose Lakes, Senator, Skull Valley, Taylor Hicks, Thumb Butte/Dearing Pk, Walnut Grove, White Spar, and Yarnell.

A short clip of Mr. Sigafoos off-hand statement at the Board meeting is attached below.

 

WHY IS PUBLIC/PRESS BARRED FROM OBSERVING POLITICAL GATHERING REGARDING FUTURE OF COLLEGE?

April 13 event  on Verde Valley Campus has College inviting mayors and other public officials to share impressions and ideas but public and press barred as observers

Commentary

Yavapai Community College will hold an invitation only forum described as an effort to obtain “local feedback on the College’s performance and role it can play in their communities” on April 13 in the Community Room, Verde Valley Campus from 10 AM to 11:30 AM. The College is inviting a select group of public officials and is controlling the agenda for the meeting.

The Community College refuses to allow anyone from the public or the press to attend and observe the meeting. One Governing Board member, Connie Harris, thinks this is a good idea. She said it is a good idea because it provides a “safe with anonymous feedback.” So much for open discussion about the College.

The College understands that running a closed meeting like this allows it to avoid anyone with knowledge of College operations from challenging the report of the meeting that it will later issue. It also prevents anyone with knowledge of College operations from raising questions about the efficacy of views and statements made. This kind of approach, however, is consistent with the Colleges iron-fisted control over all of its operation.  It views itself more as a private corporation; not a taxpayer public institution accountable to the citizens of the County.

The College will limit the number of Board members who can attend this meeting to two. Otherwise, it would require the meeting to be open pursuant to Arizona’s Open Meeting Law.

———————————————————————-

 

WILLS EQUATES PRIVATE TALKS WITH BOARD MEMBERS WITH “TRANSPARENCY”

McCasland argues “transparency” means public discussion

The question of transparency of Board decisions and the affect of private Board discussions with President Penelope Wills came up during the February 2018 Board meeting.  Representative Deb McCasland has consistently argued that the Governing Board should discuss more issues openly during Board meetings.

President Wills urged McCasland to call her about concerns she has saying that she hears from Board members privately on areas such as music, athletics, budgets. When McCasland replied that such discussion should be transparent, Wills’ agreed but equated the private discussions to “transparency.”

See if you agree after viewing the short clip below.