Archive for District Governing Board

SHROUDED IN SECRECY, GOVERNING BOARD CHAIR MCCASLAND CONTINUES TO REFUSE TO EXPLAIN TO THE PUBLIC WHY A TYPICAL LIVE BOARD MEETING AT THE ROCKHOUSE ON THE PRESCOTT CAMPUS IS “UNSAFE”

Secret 15 to 20 minute meeting held February 18 on the safety issue with no information made public afterwards:   Should students and the public be worried?

The Yavapai Community College Governing Board’s first order of business at its February 18 meeting was to call a secret executive session to discuss “Facility Safety and Security Measures.” Only three of the five Governing Board members attended the secret meeting in addition to College president Dr. Lisa Rhine.

The closed-door session, allegedly “ hosted” by Rhine, lasted approximately 15 minutes and the topic was “facility safety.”  When the attendees emerged from the session, they were smiling. However, not a word was uttered about the supposed campus safety claim being made by Chair Deb McCasland.

Notably, before Tuesday’s Board meeting, McCasland claimed in an email sent to the Governing Board members that she had learned of “safety concerns related to our board meetings.” The concerns, whatever they were,  appeared so serious to her that she switched the February 18 live meeting from the Rock House on the Prescott Campus to one on zoom.

Despite the change, McCasland has continued to withhold from the public any information about the alleged safety concerns. 

Deepening the mystery, at least two District Governing Board members had sought an explanation or evidence from McCasland to substantiate her safety concern claim prior to Tuesday’s secret executive meeting. Yet, even when directly asked  via email by them for facts, she rejected the request.

The entire mystery surrounding the public facility safety claim isn’t just unusual—it’s deeply unsettling to students at Yavapai Community College and the public.

CHAIR MCCASLAND ABRUPTLY SHIFTS YAVAPAI COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT GOVERNING BOARD MEETINGS TO ZOOM BECAUSE OF UNSPECIFIED “SAFETY CONCERNS”

Provides no evidence or examples  to Board members supporting the decision; Representative Payne asks for information regarding the nature of the concerns and fears that the zoom mode of communication may interfere with Board open discussion of issues

On Thursday afternoon, February 6, 2025, members of the Yavapai Community College District Governing Board were notified via email that, due to unspecified “safety concerns,” future Board meetings would be held on Zoom. The notice stated that Chair McCasland “believes this will allow all meeting attendees, including the public, to participate in a safe setting.”

McCasland provided no examples or further explanation for the abrupt and somewhat alarming decision. Third District Representative Toby Payne sent an email to Chair McCasland requesting clarification about the “safety concerns” that prompted the switch to Zoom meetings. So far, there has been no reply.

Representative Toby Payne

When questioned by the Blog about McCasland’s safety concerns, Payne indicated he was unaware of any. When asked if he had received any threats, he responded, “No.” He commented that he was concerned that the switch to the virtual format may interfere with communication during the meetings among Board members.

It is noteworthy that during the month of January  the Governing Board has held two workshops with each lasting around six hours. There was no opportunity for the public to speak at either meeting.  However, there were few, if any, members of the public present at either meeting.

The relevant portions of the two emails are set out below:

(Email from Yvonne Sandoval, Executive Assistant to the President & District Governing Board)

Sent:  Thursday, February 6, 2025 2:15 PM

Subject: Important Statement from Board Chair McCasland

“Good afternoon, Board Member,”

“Per Board Chair McCasland’s directive, letting you know that after learning of safety concerns related to our board meetings, she has decided that governing board meetings will be held virtually only until further notice.  Meetings will be live-streamed and recorded in the same way governing board meetings were handled during pandemic closures.  We will provide notice of this change to the public on our website, and the information will also be included on all meeting agendas.  She believes that this will allow all meeting attendees, including the public, to participate in meetings in a safe setting.“

Mr. Payne’s response:

“Chair McCasland:

“Please explain to all the Board members what your “Safety Concerns” are that have prompted your switch to a Virtual Meeting for the Yavapai College Board.  I believe this will hinder the free flow of discussion.”

Toby Payne

THIRD DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE PAYNE SEEKS CLARITY ON CONFLICTS BETWEEN ARIZONA LAW AND COLLEGE POLICIES

Sends letter to Chair McCasland requesting a workshop discussion on policy misalignment—McCasland has yet to respond

Representative Toby Payne

Third District Yavapai Community College District Governing Board member Toby Payne has formally requested that Board Chair Deb McCasland convene a meeting to address potential conflicts between state law and policies adopted by the Board and the Higher Learning Commission (HLC), the institution’s accrediting body. 

As of this writing, it is believed that McCasland has yet to respond to Payne’s request.

In his letter, Payne raises concerns regarding the delegation of authority to the college president and the alignment of state law with existing HLC and Board policies. Normally, state law should take precedence over any Board or HLC policies that directly conflict with it.

Payne has requested a discussion to provide clarification and education on these matters. His full letter is reproduced below.

To: Deb McCasland, YCGB Chair

From: Toby Payne, YCGB Member

Subject: Concerns Regarding Governance and Policy Alignment

I am deeply and sincerely disturbed by the current tension within the governing board and between the board and YC administration. After reviewing Policy 310, Resolution 2024-18, Arizona State Statutes, and the Higher Learning Commission’s (HLC) Criteria for Accreditation, I have identified several critical areas requiring attention, conversation, and deliberation among governing board members.

Key Concerns

l . Delegation of Authority: The subject of “delegation of authority” resulted in Lynne Adams providing copies of Attorney’s opinion letters and related correspondence from 2006 and 2010. However, these documents focus on “appoint and employ” versus “appoint or employ” and contracting. They do not address broader governance implications.

Resolution 2024-18 states: “The President shall be authorized to establish all college operational policies, make all decisions, take all actions, establish all practices and develop all activities.” This language appears inconsistent with HLC Criteria Core Component 5.A.I , which reads “Shared governance at the institution engages its internal constituencies—including its governing board, administration, faculty, staff and students—through planning, policies and procedures.”

2. Policy Development and Approval of Policy 310 was presented to the board as part of a packaged consent agenda, with no prior engagement or shared governance process. As such, it cannot be considered a “board policy” but rather one imposed on the board.

Policy 310 references Policy 401, stating: “ The board acknowledges the difference between governance and administration of the college.” This raises questions about clarity and boundaries between governance and administration. Additionally, the statement that “the board’s primary function is to establish the policies by which the college shall be administered” conflicts with instances where the college appears to develop policies that administer the board.

3. Alignment with HLC Criteria and State Statutes HLC Core Component 2.C underscores the autonomy of the governing board to make decisions and highlights the importance of compliance with its subpoints, particularly l, 3, and 5.

Arizona Revised Statutes 15-1444(A) explicitly state that each district board shall “visit each community college under its jurisdiction and examine carefully into its management, conditions, and needs.” This duty cannot be restricted by the administration and contradicts the Resolution’s assertion that “the Board’s sole official connection to the operational organization, its achievement, and conduct is through the College President.”

Lynne Adams made the point clear in her opinion letter dated March 10, 2006 page 3, that “except as otherwise provided” expressly recognizes that the legislature may make exceptions to the general grants of power found in that statute, as a modifier of the powers of the Board.

Proposed Actions

l . Education on Delegation of Authority: I propose a discussion and education session led by our attorney to distinguish between delegating authority and relinquishing or waiving authority. This will clarify the board’s role as the legally constituted and final authority for the operation of Yavapai County Community College District.

2. Work Session on Governance and Policy Alignment: I request that you, as Chair, schedule an agenda item and a work study session to address the following:

        • Ensuring alignment between state statutes, HLC criteria, and board policies.
        • Clarifying governance boundaries and roles.
        • Establishing a shared governance process for policy development
        •  

3. Preparation for HLC Assurance Review: With the next HLC Assurance Review in two years, now is the time to ensure compliance and alignment at all levels. Addressing these concerns proactively will foster good communication, clear boundaries, and shared understanding between the board and administration.

Conclusion

Chair McCasland, I urge you to prioritize these issues and engage the full board in discussions before adopting any further policies or resolutions. Open communication and collaborative efforts are essential to resolving current tensions and ensuring effective governance that benefits Yavapai College and its stakeholders. I expect that you, Dr. Rhine, David Borofsky and Lynne Adams will discuss this, but precisely the point is that this needs to be discussed with the board.

Thank you for your attention to this critical matter.

Respectfully,

Toby Payne

IN AN OCCASIONALLY TENSE MEETING, MCCASLAND RE-ELECTED AGAIN AS YAVAPAI COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD CHAIR IN 3-2 VOTE OVER PAYNE; BRACETY NAMED SECRETARY

 Board Lawyer and McCasland interrupt and quash Kiel’s effort to fully explain why he felt McCasland was not qualified with attorney suggesting his statement (questions) were denigrating McCasland and McCasland ruled him out of order

Deb McCasland was re-elected as the Yavapai Community College District Governing Board Chair by a 3-2 vote, defeating Third District Representative Toby Payne. In the same meeting, District 5 Representative Steve Bracety was chosen as Board Secretary. The election occurred during the District Governing Board’s workshop January 14.  McCasland will have served as chair for seven years when she completes this term in 2027.

The election process  turned contentious when newly elected Bill Kiel attempted to explain how his initial interactions with McCasland had negatively shaped his view of her leadership. Before he could fully elaborate on what occurred, both McCasland and the Board attorney interrupted him on several occasions. At one point McCasland ruled him out of order and the Board attorney suggested  he was denigrating McCasland when discussing her negative behavior. She forcefully directed him to concentrate on Toby Payne’s qualifications, not Ms. McCasland’s negatives.

 The following is a rough transcription of a portion of the exchange between Kiel, McCasland, and the Board attorney:

Kiel:  “At the last Board meeting . . .”

McCasland interrupts:  “We’re talking about the election?”

Kiel referring to Ms. McCasland:  “Yes, yes. Right now I want to talk about an interaction between you and I.”

McCasland interrupts:  “It is not relevant.”

 Kiel: It is  relevant to this. At the last Board meeting (in November after he had just been elected) I introduced myself to you and I said I look forward to a positive and productive meeting.  I want to know why you told me that you doubt that we could have a positive and productive. . . .”

Board attorney:  “O.K. We’re moving, moving on now.  You can make a statement (McCasland in background also attempting to interrupt) but this is not a deposition. “

McCasland:  “No.”

Board attorney:  “You can make your statement but you’re not asking her a question.  (“remainder unclear”)

 Kiel addressing McCasland: (McCasland continues talking in background)  “I don’t understand why you tell me that you doubted that we could have a positive and professional relationship? I sent you on twelve eighteen . . .

McCasland:  Sir, you are out of order.

Kiel:  No, I am not. This goes to why I . . .

Board attorney interrupts:  “Mr. Payne, Let’s focus on Mr. Payne.  And why you think  he is appropriate as opposed to denigrating your fellow board member.” 

Kiel attempting to proceed:  “on twelve twenty-eighteen and last Sunday I emailed Ms. McCasland and asked her for . . .”

McCasland interrupting:  “This has nothing  to do with . . .”

Kiel:  “This has everything to do it . . .”

Board attorney interrupted:  “Mr. Kiel, focus on why Mr. Payne is appropriate. We do not need to denigrate the current chair . . .”

Kiel:  I’m not denigrating her, I just saying the current chair is not doing what is required . . .”

McCasland interjecting:  “Then I think you’ve made you point.”

Board attorney interrupting Kiel:  “Then you’re done.  So focus on Mr. Payne. He’s got a lot of positive qualities.  I’m sure we could talk about that as opposed to talking about what you believe Ms. McCasland’s negative qualities are.  Focus on Mr. Payne and why you nominated him and believe he would be appropriate.”

McCasland, nominated for her third consecutive two-year term by Bracety, argued that her extensive experience made her the most qualified candidate. She cited her five years of service as Chair and national recognition. (McCasland was named Trustee of the Year by the American Association of Community Colleges (AACC) at its 2023 annual meeting in Denver, Colorado.) McCasland later nominated Bracety to serve as Secretary.

The deciding vote for McCasland came from newly appointed Representative Patrick Kuykendall, who indicated  that he has known the McCasland family for some time and applauded their civic involvement.

Arguments for Change in Leadership

Kiel, who nominated Payne for Chair, voiced concerns about the Board’s longstanding leadership practices. During his campaign, he said he met many constituents dissatisfied with how funds were distributed across districts. He argued that electing a Chair from District 3 would demonstrate goodwill (and to some extent  address historical imbalances).

Kiel also noted that District 3 had not been represented in the Chair role for at least 15 years, a precedent he considered troubling. Drawing on his 20 years of experience on various boards, Kiel remarked that it was unusual for a governing board to retain the same Chair for multiple consecutive terms. He advocated for leadership rotation, which, he argued, fosters fresh perspectives, promotes collaboration, and develops leadership skills among board members. He added that having multiple members with experience as Chair enhances stability, especially in cases of unforeseen circumstances such as illness or resignation.

GOVERNING BOARD MEMBERS MAY NOT TALK WITH ANY MEMBER OF THE 500-1,000 PART OR FULL-TIME STAFF WHILE CONDUCTING MANDATED STATUTORY VISITS TO CAMPUSES ACCORDING TO YAVAPAI COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD LAWYER

Discussion during visit with staff may result in raising serious accreditation issues

Newly elected Yavapai Community College Governing Board member Bill Kiel raised a question during the Governing Board’s January 14, 2025 workshop about the meaning of a provision found in section A(1) of Arizona Statute 14-1444. This statute directs a District Governing Board to visit and examine the management, conditions, and needs of each campus under its jurisdiction. Representative Kiel queried whether, during such a visit, a Yavapai Community College District Board member could ask questions of any of the 500 to 1,000 persons now employed by the College.

The statute reads as follows:

The Community College Board attorney indicated that a Board member could not speak directly with a member of the staff. Rather, any question the Board member might have must go directly to the president of Yavapai Community College. Moreover, a Board member could never, for example, alone visit a campus or center and discuss a matter with a member of the staff, even inadvertently. 

The Board lawyer intimated in a somewhat confusing fashion that discussion with a staff member during a visit, or otherwise, could well raise serious accreditation questions.

Thus, the Board attorney’s opinion, as best the Blog can understand it, appears to tie the hands of any Board member learning or asking anything directly from any member of the staff during a Board visit to a campus or otherwise. One could argue that the 500 to 1,000 part-time and full-time employees and the District Governing Board are effectively muzzled when it comes to any interaction between them at any time. 

Please view the following video clip of the attorney providing a short response to Mr. Kiel’s question during the January 14, 2025 workshop for verification.

NEWLY ELECTED YAVAPAI COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD MEMBER BILL KIEL LAUNCHES WEBSITE TO SHARE VIEWS AND FOSTER DIRECT COMMUNICATION

A first in Yavapai Community College District Governing Board history: Kiel encourages open dialogue with constituents through innovative platform

Yavapai Community College District Governing Board’s newly elected First District representative, William (Bill) Kiel, has launched a website to share his personal views about the community college with his constituents. The website also invites constituents to contact him directly.

This initiative marks the first time in the Board’s history that a member has established a system to foster direct communication with the district’s residents. Mr. Kiel’s effort aims to make his personal positions about the Community College widely accessible while encouraging feedback and dialogue from his constituents.

The website already features several of his personal views on key topics, including college finances, transparency, and concerns about potential wasteful spending. Notably, one of his most interesting posts outlines his goals for the first 100 days of his term on the Board.

William (Bill) Kiel

For many, Mr. Kiel’s approach represents a welcome change in how the Community College engages with its stakeholders. With an annual taxpayer-funded budget of approximately $125 million, the institution has grown far beyond its early “mom and pop” scale. In fact, it ranks among the highest County taxpayer property tax supported institutions in Yavapai County.

You may visit his website by  going to https://vote4bill.com/1st_100_Days.html.

FORMER GOVERNING BOARD MEMBER PAUL CHEVALIER SPEAKS OUT OVER EFFORTS TO SILENCE THE YAVAPAI COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT GOVERNING BOARD

Says that since he left as the Third District representative to the Board (Sedona, most of Verde Valley) that the Community College leadership with west side majority support has sought to erode its  power. Will new Board in January alter  these policies?

Paul Chevalier

Opinion:  When I was on the Yavapai College Board for four years the subject of the college silencing the Board was brought up at least three times at meetings I was at by the administration but never as a Board action. Each time it came up I stated it was unconstitutional under both the state and federal Constitutions. The college then said it had instructed its management not to answer Board members questions and that was the end of the discussion.

Since I left, the college administration has eroded Board power continuously, all with the consent of the four Board members who live on the west side of our county. Only the east side member who replaced me opposed it.  Four members of the five member Board, with two of them being lame duck west side members in their final Board meeting, have now agreed (by resolution) for the Board to be almost powerless under the control of the President and her senior management, That is the opposite of Arizona legislative intent. The Board by law is supposed to govern the college administration not vice versa.

 Unless three members of the next or some future five member Board decide to end this unconstitutional resolution the Yavapai College Board will remain what it has become, which is a meaningless entity. I expect Board members will follow the resolution even though, I believe, it has no legal standing. We, on the east side, can expect practically no educational classroom courses for our residents from this administration which has broken promises it has made to improve it. The college administration will do whatever it feels like doing and it doesn’t feel like doing much in the way of classroom education for the east side residents. Moreover it is continually raising taxes for all county residents through the roof for land purchases that make no logical sense.

Paul Chevalier

Elected Yavapai College Board member representing the east side 2018 to 2022

YAVAPAI COUNTY SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT TIM CARTER SEEKING APPLICANTS FOR OPEN COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD SEAT CREATED BY CHRIS KUKNYO’S RESIGNATION (DISTRICT 4)

Deadline to show interest is December 2

Yavapai County School Superintendent Tim Carter has initiated the process of filling the Yavapai Community College District Governing Board seat soon to be vacated by District 4 representative Chris Kuknyo. This District includes North Prescott, Chino Valley, Paulden, Ash Fork, Seligman, and surrounding areas. Kuknyo will remain on the Board until December 31, 2024, and the new appointment is expected to be finalized and announced by December 18, 2024.

Application Details
Individuals interested in serving on the Board are invited to submit a letter of interest and a resume to Superintendent Tim Carter at the Yavapai County Education Service Agency. Submissions can be sent to the following address:

  • Mail: 2970 Centerpointe East, Prescott, AZ 86301
  • Fax: 928-771-3329
  • Email: Tim.Carter@yavapaiaz.gov

Applicants should include details about their background, including family, education, and work experience, as well as an explanation of why they wish to join the Board. The letter must also include the applicant’s residence and mailing address, email address, and home/work phone numbers. Additionally, candidates may submit up to three letters of recommendation.

The deadline for submitting all materials is Monday, December 2, 2024, at 5:00 p.m.

Selection Process
A five-person committee will review all applications, resumes, and any letters of recommendation. The committee will include:

  1. A taxpayer.
  2. A faculty member.
  3. A student.
  4. An elected official.
  5. A workforce development professional.

This committee will shortlist candidates for interviews, establish interview questions, and conduct the interviews on December 13, 2024. Afterward, they will recommend finalists for Superintendent Carter’s consideration.

Before making the final selection, Carter will consult individually with the currently seated Yavapai College Governing Board members to gather their input on the finalists. However, this process raises a notable issue: outgoing Board member Ray Sigafoos, who was defeated in the recent election, will participate in candidate discussions, while newly elected Board member William Kiel, who begins his term in January 2025, will not.

Eligibility Criteria
To be eligible for the District 4 seat, applicants must meet the following qualifications:

  • Be a registered voter residing in District 4.
  • Be a U.S. citizen at least 18 years of age.
  • Have civil rights intact.
  • Neither the applicant nor their spouse may be employed by the college district.

This is a non-partisan seat, and the appointment process will adhere to the statutory requirements.

YAVAPAI COMMUNITY COLLEGE LEADERS SUMMON GOVERNING BOARD TO A SECOND SECRET EXECUTIVE MEETING IN THREE WEEKS ON THURSDAY, OCTOBER 17

Second secretive meeting appears to be on the same topic, which is purchase or lease of land in the Prescott area. Urgency suggests College execs want to quickly close a land deal of some sort.

The Yavapai Community College Governing Board was summoned by College leaders to a closed one-hour meeting on Thursday, October 17. The secretive session, held via Zoom, was scheduled to discuss the potential purchase or lease of new land in the Prescott area.

The sudden urgency of the meeting raises suspicions that the College is rushing to close some sort of property deal. Notably, just three weeks ago, the Governing Board held another secret meeting, also at the request of College leaders, to discuss a similar or possibly the same matter.

As usual, local residents remain completely in the dark.

It’s worth noting that the College has never publicly indicated a need for additional Prescott area property in recent meetings. Yet readers may recall that the same secretive approach was used when the College suddenly purchased the 42-acre church camp just outside Prescott for millions in May of this year with a goal of converting it into a major housing and training facility.

This is yet another instance where the taxpayer-funded institution shows little to no accountability to the Yavapai County residents who finance it. 

AFTER ALMOST FOUR MONTHS WITHOUT A BUSINESS MEETING, YAVAPAI COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT GOVERNING BOARD ANNOUNCES ITS FIRST FALL MEETING FOR TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24

Last business meeting was May 21; last  workshop May 28; one meeting at Clarkdale campus is on fall schedule

The Yavapai Community College District Governing Board has announced its fall schedule.  Its first business meeting is set for September 24, which is almost four months since it last met on May 21. Two of the fall meetings are scheduled at the Prescott Campus Rock House while one will be held on the Clarkdale Campus.

The December meeting on the schedule is a Governing Board dinner.