Archive for Budget – Page 6

YAVAPAI COLLEGE ADMINISTRATION SEEKS 2% PROPERTY TAX INCREASE AT MAY 8 MEETING

After resistance from three members of the Governing Board (Sigafoos, McCarver, McCasland) at January 2018 meeting when 4% increase suggested, Administrators moving forward with 2% rate increase request

The Yavapai Community College formally has announced that it will seek a 2% property tax increase at the May 8, 2018 Governing Board meeting.  It made the announcement in the news media April 13, 2018.  (See, for example, The Verde Independent, dated Friday, April 13, 2018.)  The Governing Board representatives have not held public meetings in their districts to discuss the proposed rate increase and apparently do not intend to do so.

The College will ask for a 2% increase in primary property taxes, which will produce revenue of about $896,100 annually.  The College indicated in January 2018 it wanted a 4% tax rate increase to accompany a 5% tuition increase.  Chair Ray Sigafoos, and Board members Deb McCarver and Deb McCasland indicated a proposed 4% property tax increase was not acceptable.  However, the Board approved a 5% tuition increase at its February 2018 meeting 4 – 1 (McCasland dissenting). 

The Governing Board last approved a tax rate increase in 2015 (3 – 2).  There was unanimous opposition from the two Verde Valley representatives (Al Filardo, Deb McCasland) to that property tax rate increase.  There was also unanimous opposition from the Verde Valley Board Advisory Committee, which had representatives spread throughout the East side of the County.  The opposition made no difference to West-County Board members Sigafoos, McCarver, and Steve Irwin.

A video summary of the Board reaction in January 2018 to the proposed 4% property tax increase follows.

NEW FINANCIAL ESTIMATE SUGGESTS VERDE VALLEY (INCLUDING SEDONA) TAXPAYERS AS COLLEGE EQUITY OWNERS SHOULD RECEIVE UP TO $24 MILLION ANNUALLY FOR DEVELOPMENT, MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS

Unfortunately, College spends only $7.5 million — not $24 million — in the Verde Valley leaving millions on the table for West County use

A new in-depth financial estimate conducted by accountant and realtor Mr. Rob Witt suggests that the Verde Valley (including Sedona) as equity owners of the College should receive about $24 million annually for development, maintenance, and operations of the Verde Campus in Clarkdale and the Sedona Center. He says that the Blog report showing that the Verde Valley property taxpayers provide $14.7 million in property taxes is correct. However, he argues that this figure is far below what the Valley taxpayers should receive as equity owners in the College. He puts that figure at $24 million. 

Recall that the College annually collects $14.7 million in property taxes in the Verde Valley and there is general agreement the College spends only $7.5 million of that money in the Verde Valley. This leaves $7.2 million left over in property taxes alone.  (Note that over a two-year period 2016-17 the College invested about $2.5 to $3 million in capital improvements in each of those two years to renovate the Sedona Center.) Mr. Witt points out that there are millions of dollars in non-property tax revenue flowing to the College that are generated by Verde Valley students and families such as tuition, state aid, federal aid, grants and gifts.

Here is Mr. Witt’s equity argument: “When you summarize the property tax estimate from the East Valley, the Blog’s percentage is correct, however, by leaving off the East Valley’s percent of other revenue sources the Blog is significantly undervaluing the East Valley contribution. From an accounting standpoint, I look at the College budget like equity ownership. East County taxes fund 30% of the College Special District. This equates to 30% of the revenues and 30% of the expenses. The budget revenue is $82 million so the East County’s return should be 30% of that figure or $24 million.”

Mr. Witt has written to the College asking for a response to his detailed analysis with a spreadsheet in support of it. His spreadsheet is not included in this Blog. So far, he has not heard from the College.

NEW TAX LAW BENEFITS YAVAPAI COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Extends Proposition 301 sales tax due to expire in 2021 to 2041

Yavapai Community College breathed a sigh of relief when Governor Doug Ducey signed into law a bill extending for 20 years the education sales tax rate that generates about $667 million annually for Arizona schools. For the past several years, Yavapai College has indicated concern that it would lose the annual State contribution from proposition 301 when it sunsetted in 2021. That concern is now gone.

The College annually receives state assistance in three categories: First, it receives about $640,000 based on enrollment. Increased enrollment means increased state aid. This is called “maintenance support.”

Second, the College has been receiving about $639,000 pursuant to a special Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) grant.

Finally, it receives about $700,000 from the State as its “State Shared Sales Tax.” Because of the new law, the sales tax revenue flowing to the College is no longer in danger of evaporating.

It was almost 20 years ago when Governor Jane Hull and Arizona voters passed Proposition 301.

———————————————————————-

COLLEGE PROVIDES DETAILS REGARDING NEED FOR $2.7 MILLION MORE IN REVENUE FOR 2018-19

Fears 1% decline in student enrollment; Increases in compensation estimated at $1.52 million

The Community College has provided details of its preliminary assumptions for the 2018-19 academic year.  Among the data furnished the College District Governing Board, about  $1.52 million of new revenue will be used as additional compensation for faculty and staff.  The remainder of the $2.7 million in new revenue will be allotted to maintenance and programmatic initiatives.

The College Administration projects that a 4% increase in the tax rate will bring in an additional $1 million in revenue and the 5% increase in tuition will yield about $500,000 in new revenue.  The preliminary assumptions appear below as they were presented to the Governing Board.

———————————————————

COLLEGE PRESS RELEASE ABOUT GOVERNING BOARD MEETING SAYS NOTHING OF 4% TAX RATE INCREASE

Best to keep taxpayers in the dark; No newspaper accounts so far

It is of interest that when Yavapai Community College released its press report explaining what took place at the January 16, 2018 Governing Board meeting there was no mention of Wills’ request for a 4% tax rate hike (or 5% tuition increase).  But for the Blog and the videotape of the meeting, Yavapai residents would be completely in the dark about her  tax rate request. As of this date, there have been no local newspaper accounts of the tax rate request and the Governing Board reaction to it.

You may view the Community College press release about the meeting by clicking here.

You may view the entire Board meeting including the videotape where the Wills’ Administration asked the Governing Board to consider a 4% property tax rate increase by clicking here as soon as it is posted.

—————————————————————

VIDEO SHOWS GOVERNING BOARD UNEASE WITH 4% TAX RATE INCREASE; OPPOSITION TO 5% TUITION HIKE UNCLEAR

Tax hike appears to have more opposition than tuition increase

The video below shows the Community College Governing Board discussing Dr. Clint Ewell’s tentative budget increase suggestions for 2017-18. The discussion took place January 16 during the regular Board meeting on the Prescott Campus.

It appears that at least three members were uneasy with the Administration’s suggestion that it consider approving in February a 5% tuition increase  and in May a 4% property tax increase.  (Representative Connie Harris was seen occasionally nodding, which suggests she may have also been concerned.) 

Chair Ray Sigafoos seemed most concerned with the property tax rate hike.  Representative Deb McCasland pointed out that there was a questionable need for more money to increase deferred maintenance and alluded to the College’s large reserves.  Representative Pat McCarver seemed concerned with both the tuition and tax rate hike. The video is about four minutes in length.

VP CLINT EWELL EXPLAINS ON VIDEO PRELIMINARY BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS

Says College needs $2.7 million more in revenue for 2018-19

The short video below contains Dr. Clint Ewell’s list of needs that the Administration believes justifies its request for a 4% property rate increase and a 5% tuition increase.  The list is “preliminary” although the tuition rate will be set next month at the February Board meeting.

WILLS SEEKS 4% PROPERTY TAX RATE HIKE; 5% TUITION INCREASE: BOARD NOT ENTHUSIASIC

McCasland, Sigafoos & McCarver voice concerns  with Wills’ request;  Harris and Irwin silent

The Wills’ administration, in preliminary talks about the 2018-19 budget at the Governing Board meeting on Tuesday, January 16, sought large increases in revenue flowing to the College. The Administration suggested a four percent increase in the Yavapai County Property Tax rate.  It also suggested a five percent student tuition increase for 2018-19.

The suggested increases did not go down well with at least three members of the Board. Board members Deb McCasland (Verde Valley/West side), Ray Sigafoos (Prescott) and Pat McCarver (Chino Valley) all indicated concern with the either the tax rate or tuition or both.   Sigafoos seemed particularly concerned about the tax rate increase. He suggested the Administration go back to the drawing board and return with a more reasonable proposal.

Third District Verde Valley Representative Connie Harris and Prescott Valley Representative Steve Irwin said nothing.

The proposal by the Wills administration is a preliminary one.   In February the first serious test of the recommendation will come when the Board sets tuition for the 2018-19 academic year.  The tax rate decision will come after that with a final decision in May or June 2018.

WHAT DID 2016-17 LOOK LIKE FINANCIALLY? WHAT DOES 2017-18 LOOK LIKE?

 Overall, it appears the College had $10,579,719 more to spend in 2017-18 that it did in 2008-09 and an overall student body taking accredited courses that had shrunk by almost 30%. 

The fiscal year for the College ended June 30, 2017.  This is the detailed information given the Governing Board about its financial and enrollment situation when it ended the fiscal year in June 2017.  It is worth reviewing as we close out the calendar year 2017.

  1. The College estimated in May it will lose an estimated $330,000 in 2017-18 state aid because of the decline in the number of students taking accredited classes. This estimate should change because student enrollment has leveled off.

  2. The aviation program, which has already lost more than a million dollars in tuition and fees over the past two years, will lose another $160,000 in 2017-18 because of the continuing decline in enrollment in that particular program. So far, there is no indication this estimate will change.

  3. County property taxes will not be increased in 2017. 2017 is the second year in a row the Governing Board has not increased the tax rate. Recall that a majority vote of three on this Board can increase the tax rate on the property taxes of Yavapai County voters. (And there is no oversight and no appeal.)

  4. Tuition was increased for 2017-18 by about 5%. This is far above local  inflation. The Governing Board has increased tuition in some form every year over the last decade. The tuition increases have far outpaced inflation every year.

  1. What is called the County “new-construction tax” will bring in about $680,000 in additional revenue to the College in 2017-18.

  2. When comparing student headcount from 2008-09 to 2015-16 (the last formal report from the College) there are 3,894 fewer students taking credit courses (14,139 vs. 10,245). This is a drop of 27.5% in student enrollment. The decline continued in 2016-17.  While the Governing Board received a prediction in May 2017 that enrollment would decline by 4% in 2017-18, it actually increased slightly.

  3. When comparing student tuition and fees 2008-09 to 2017-18 the College will be collecting $4,678,500 more in tuition and fees in 2017-18 than it did almost a decade ago despite the huge drop in student enrollment. ($6,927,300 vs. $11,605,800).

  4. When comparing primary property tax revenue from 2008-09 to 2017-18 the College will be collecting $8,683,119 more in property taxes in 2017-18 that it did in 2008-09 ($35,227,381 vs. $43,910,500). Almost all of the increase is used to support capital expenditures.  Traditionally, the College had to persuade voters to approve a General Obligation Bond before revenue was expended for capital improvements. The Bond was repaid by assessing a County-wide secondary property tax.  The College now uses primary tax revenue, which was once intended primarily for programs and staff salaries, for capital projects.  This keeps County citizens from asking questions about the projects; the process also gives the Administration almost total discretion to build and renovate whatever it desires  without justifying the project to the citizens (and the expenditure of their tax money) or  explaining the overall efficacy of the project to them.

  5. Note that in 2008-09 state aid accounted for $4,761,000 in revenue coming to the College. It is estimated that in 2017-18 the College will receive about $1,979,100 from the state of Arizona in total support. That is a difference of $2,781,900.

  6.  Overall, it appears that College will have $10,579,719 more in revenue to spend in 2017-18  that it did in 2008-09 and a student body taking accredited courses that has shrunk by almost 30% (using headcount) over the past decade.

 

COLLEGE SPENDS $17 MILLION DURING LAST FISCAL YEAR ON CAPITAL PROJECTS

Total expenditures 148.9% of budget with overrun due to Prescott Valley building expansion and Sedona Center remodel

The Yavapai Community College administration reported to the Governing Board at its August 8, 2017 meeting that it had spent $17,343,277 during the fiscal year 2016 – 17 on capital projects. It had originally budgeted $11,648,400 to spend on buildings and grounds during that period. It attributed the additional $6 million increase in capital spending to the Prescott Valley building expansion and the Sedona Center remodel. 

Because College has so many millions of dollars paid in by taxpayers annually, there was no need for any bonding needed to provide $17 million for these capital projects. As this blog has repeatedly told its readers, the college is flush with revenue. Furthermore, in the opinion of the blog, there is little serious oversight over how these millions are spent each year after basic educational expenses are met.

You may view the College explanation and verify the amount spent on capital projects during the past fiscal year by clicking here and going to page 23 of 154.